Building a Resilient World: Practical Automation Cybersecurity

Securing PLCs Through the Backplane: Balancing Performance and Simplicity

Written by Ashraf Sainudeen | Dec 6, 2024 12:00:00 PM

With the increasing convergence of operational technology (OT) and information technology (IT), the need for robust security in industrial systems has never been greater. Advanced security features leveraging PLC backplane access present a groundbreaking opportunity to protect industrial control systems (ICS) at their core. However, as with any innovation, this approach brings challenges, particularly around costs, complexity and performance.

This blog post explores the potential of PLC backplane security, addresses concerns about its impact on system performance and provides strategies to manage costs and complexity effectively.

Understanding PLC Backplane Security

PLC backplane security involves embedding advanced monitoring, validation and anomaly detection capabilities directly into the PLC hardware or its supporting systems. By enabling real-time access to PLC logic and operational data, this approach offers unprecedented visibility and control over industrial processes. It’s akin to bringing endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools into the OT world, with tailored adaptations for the unique requirements of industrial systems.

Real-Time Threat Detection

Monitor PLC logic execution patterns and compare them against a baseline to detect anomalies indicative of cyberattacks. Log every modification made to PLC programs — including source details, timestamps and the exact changes made — to identify unauthorized updates. Use predefined signatures to detect known malicious patterns or logic fragments within the PLC code.

Prevention Mechanisms

Implement a security layer that scans and verifies all uploaded logic against security policies or digital signatures, rejecting potentially harmful updates. Test new logic in a virtualized environment before allowing it to be executed on the PLC to prevent the loading of malicious code.

Incident Response Capabilities

Upon detecting malicious code, the system could revert the PLC to a previous known-good state, minimizing downtime and damage. Detect and isolate affected PLCs by blocking communication on the backplane or with other systems to contain the threat.

Improved Visibility and Forensics

Capture granular logs — such as backplane communication, I/O operations and logic execution traces — to assist in forensic investigations. Provide operational metrics with security telemetry to offer insights into potential vulnerabilities or weak points in the system.

Active Defense Capabilities

Deploy decoy routines or configurations within the PLC to attract attackers and study their behavior without risking critical operations. Introduce logic that disrupts or slows down attackers while keeping operations functional, effectively buying time for response teams.

Integration with Cybersecurity Ecosystem

Make the PLC part of the enterprise EDR solution by sending telemetry data to a central security management platform. Enable PLCs to communicate detected threats or anomalies to other endpoints or a SOC for coordinated responses.

Vision for the Future

Imagine a scenario where every PLC in your facility not only executes its automation tasks but also actively participates in securing the OT environment. They could:

  • Coordinate with firewalls and IDS/IPS systems to manage threats at multiple layers.
  • Automatically patch vulnerabilities via secure firmware updates.
  • Evolve into autonomous defenders in a broader industrial IoT (IIoT) security mesh.

Does PLC Backplane Security Impact Performance?

One of the biggest concerns when integrating new security measures into PLCs is whether they will slow down functionality or response times. PLCs are designed for real-time control, where even slight delays can disrupt processes or compromise safety.

Potential for Performance Issues

  • Logic validation like analyzing uploaded control logic for malicious activity findings could introduce deployment delays.
  • Real-time analysis of backplane activity might compete for processing power and memory.
  • Features like rollback mechanisms or system isolation might momentarily pause operations.

Mitigation Strategies

  • Offload intensive tasks like anomaly detection to edge devices or gateways.
  • Ensure security checks run in parallel without interrupting critical PLC tasks.
  • Leverage PLCs with multicore processors or hardware acceleration to handle additional workloads.

Managing Costs and Complexity

Cost Considerations

  • Legacy PLCs may require upgrades to support advanced security features. Alternatively, edge devices can be deployed to handle processing-intensive tasks.
  • Software Development: Custom-built security solutions tailored to specific OT environments may involve significant R&D costs.
  • Operational Costs: Regular updates, maintenance and training increase ongoing expenses.
  • Retrofitting existing systems to include backplane security can be costly and time-intensive.

Complexity Challenges

  • Adding security layers increases system architecture complexity, requiring careful prioritization of tasks to avoid performance bottlenecks.
  • Firmware updates and troubleshooting become more complicated with added security features.

Strategies to Balance Security, Costs and Complexity

How can we implement PLC backplane security while managing costs and operational complexity? Some of the points are mentioned below.

Use Edge Devices for Offloading Tasks

Edge devices or gateways act as intermediaries between PLCs and centralized systems. They handle computationally intensive tasks like anomaly detection, logic validation or advanced analytics, reducing the workload on the PLC itself.

  • Prevents performance slowdowns in real-time PLC operations.
  • Avoids the need to upgrade older or resource-constrained PLCs.
  • Enables scalable and powerful processing without disrupting the core control system.

Incremental Rollout

Rather than deploying all security features at once, roll them out in phases. Focus first on high-risk or critical systems, then expand to other areas based on the learnings from the initial implementation.

  • Reduces upfront costs by spreading implementation over time.
  • Minimizes disruptions to operations during deployment.
  • Provides time to fine-tune the solution for better efficiency.

Leverage Existing Infrastructure

Integrate new PLC security measures with existing security operations centers (SOC) or security information and event management (SIEM) systems, rather than building new, standalone solutions.

  • Reduces redundant investments in new tools or platforms.
  • Simplifies operations by centralizing alerts and data analysis.
  • Allows organizations to use familiar systems, minimizing the training burden.

Prioritize Lightweight Features

Begin with security features that are easy to implement and require minimal computational resources, focusing on core protective measures.

Features

  • Ensure only verified and authorized logic is uploaded to the PLC, blocking unauthorized or malicious code.
  • Observe backplane activity to identify potential threats or anomalies without actively interfering with operations.

Benefits

  • Minimizes the need for hardware upgrades.
  • Simplifies integration and reduces operational overhead.
  • Establishes a strong security foundation that can be expanded later.

Conclusion

PLC backplane security offers a transformative way to protect industrial systems by providing deep visibility and control. While it introduces challenges in terms of cost, complexity and performance, these can be mitigated with strategic implementation, thoughtful design and leveraging modern technologies.

Interested in reading more articles like this? Subscribe to the ISAGCA blog and receive weekly emails with links to thought leadership, research and other insights from the OT cybersecurity community.